Understanding moral change and moral progress.

I work at the intersection of metaethics, epistemology, and moral psychology, with a focus on how causal explanations of evaluative beliefs affect their justification.

Portrait image of Michael Klenk

About Michael Klenk

I am a lecturer in ethics and philosophy of technology at Delft University of Technology. If you want to get in touch, please contact me via email.

I obtained my PhD in Philosophy in June 2018 at Utrecht University, under the supervision of Herman Philipse. My thesis, Survival of Defeat - Evolution, Moral Objectivity, and Undercutting, was awarded the distinction 'cum laude', the highest possible distinction in the Netherlands.

Apart from my research, I enjoy organising conferences (examples: Evolution and Moral Epistemology 2018, Debunking and Disagreement 2017, Dutch-Flemish Day of Philosophy 2017, or Science Slam Stuttgart).

Below is a visualisation of what I have done so far: Degrees and working experience Michael Klenk

News!

  • 2019/02: I'll present a paper on whether and how moral anthropology can inform debate about changing values due to technology at the SPT conference in Texas in May.
  • 2018/12: My paper on the nature of undercutting defeat has been accepted by Ratio.
  • 2018/10: My paper on evolution and moral disagreement was accepted by the Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy! Also, my introduction to evolution and ethics is now out at 1000-Word Philosophy: Link.

Submitted / Working Papers

I am currently working on the projects below. Feel free to get in touch!

Modal Security and Moral Objectivity

I argue against a alethic constraint on undercutters, but that it raises a puzzle about the aim of (moral) belief.

Status: under review.

Independence and Objectivity in Ethics

Objectivity in ethics is often understood in reference to an independence relation. Roughly, the ethical values are said to be independent of what we humans think about them. I present some counterexamples to this formulation and try to make the notion more precise.

Higher Order Evidence and Moral Epistemology

Higher order evidence, evidence about the rationality of our beliefs, may help to shed some light on recent discussions in moral epistemology, such as the debate about debunking arguments in metaethics.

Status: under review.

Folk Perceptions of Moral Objectivity

Together with Jeroen Hopster I set up an experiment to explain whyconceptions of moral objectivity differ between and within people.

Status: under review.

Situationism and Moral Progress

Moral judgments are easily influenced by situational factors. I argue that this hinders moral progress and any viable conception of moral progress.

Status: under review.

Publications

Click on the journal cover to get to the published article.

picture of article 5
picture of article 4
picture of article 6
picture of article 2
picture of article 1
picture of article 3
picture of the 1000-word philosophy article
picture of Michael Klenk's thesis

Book Reviews

These are the books that I have reviewed. Click on the book to get to the published review.

Terence Cuneo, Speech and Morality
Ethical Perspectives 22 (2) 2015
Bobbi S. Low, Why Sex Matters
Metapsychology 19 (36) 2015
Finn Janning, The Happiness of Burnout
Metapsychology 19 (50) 2015
Zygmunt Bauman et al, Management in a Liquid Modern World
Ethical Perspectives 23 (2) 2016
Erik Wielenberg, Robust Ethics
Dialectica 70 (3) 2016
Thompson, A Remarkable Journey
The Quarterly Review of Biology 91 (3) 2016
Michael Tomasello, A Natural History of Human Morality
Metapsychology 20 (20) 2016
Nicholas Baumard, How Evolution Explains our Moral Nature
Metapsychology 20 (36) 2016
Jussim et al, The Social Psychology of Morality
Metapsychology 20 (48) 2016
Bowles, The Moral Economy
Marx and Philosophy Review of Books, 25.01.2017
Richard Joyce, Essay in Moral Skepticism
Ethical Perspectives 24 (1) 2017
Matthew Liao, Moral Brains
Metapsychology 21 (23) 2017
Elizabeth Anderson, Psyche and Ethos
Metapsychology 22 (48) 2018